Equality Impact Assessment Guidance
How exactly can you deploy an Equality Impact Assessment in your specific organisational context? It’s vital to ensure fairness and equality for all protected characteristics. And this may or may not be an easy thing to do, depending on the context. To help you, we’ve created a list of the key issues to consider:Â
Start Early
Kick off the EIA process as soon as possible and before any new policy formation, event, or funding activity. Making it a key pillar in your due diligence processes can help to normalise the process. Plus, an early assessment may assist with better decision-making and avoid costly mistakes, omissions, or unwanted problems.
Build Evidence
Building an evidence base is a vital part of the EIA process. You may want to involve relevant protected groups in a consultative process. This is much easier when you have in-house Employee Resource Groups (ERGs), for instance. ERGs or similar types of groups can offer first-hand insights and may lead to better organisational outcomes by as much as 8X.
Other data points to consider collecting include interviews and feedback forms, statistical analysis, complaints, or other qualitative research and feedback from within or outside of your sector.Â
Make a Reliable Judgement
In the absence of relevant, suitable, or sufficient research you may need to make a values-based decision instead. Judging the impact of your organisation’s actions on protected characteristics can be tricky, particularly in instances of new policies or management decisions that have no comparable examples.Â
If proper evidence is unavailable, it’s advised to make a judgement based on consensus and company values. Any judgement made should avoid apparent or obvious prejudice, assumptions, or potential risks to the health and wellbeing of protected groups.Â
Make an Evaluation
Protected characteristics can overlap or interconnect. For instance, groups of neurodivergent women may also need further analysis on the potential for pregnancy or maternity considerations. Evaluating the impact may be complex. But, in general, any evaluation should come down to choosing one from a list of options:Â
- No changes to make: There is little to no impact so activity can proceed.Â
- Adapt or change the activity: Make adjustments to the activity to eliminate bias.
- Proceed with caution: The impact on protected characteristics may be minimal.
- Stop the activity completely: Impact on protected characteristics may be too significant to continue.Â
Retain all EIAs and record the decisions made. Also, where there will be a significant impact on protected groups, be ready to adjust or renegotiate activities that still need to go ahead. Â