January 2024

Empowering Neurodiversity: Transformative Strategies for an Inclusive Workplace

with Theo Smith

Theo Smith is smiling in a yellow graphic hoodie and orange and green hat.

Introduction

See what a neuroinclusive future could look like.

This illuminating webinar will help you discover what neurodiversity truly means, explore the complexities of labelling, and learn actionable strategies to break down barriers and empower both yourself and your employees.

Delve into the pros and cons of labelling, and why no label should be required.

Learn how to identify and leverage strengths and challenges in a neurodiverse workforce.

Acquire actionable strategies for breaking down barriers in the workplace.

Understand how to lean out as much as leaning in to offer effective support.

Meet the Speaker – Theo Smith

Founder @ Neurodiversity World

We, as a community, are starting to reframe the way that we see ourselves, and the way that we would like to see others.

A screen capture from the live webinar where Theo Smith is wearing a dark coloured cap with a striped jersey top.
Theo Smith, Founder & Neurodiversity Advocate

Theo is the founder of Neurodiversity World – powered by Dynamis Group, a Linkedin Top Voice, author of the award-winning book ‘Neurodiversity at Work‘ and podcast host of ‘Neurodiversity with Theo Smith‘.

Theo has been in HR and Talent leadership for 15+ years and, together with Dynamis Group, consulted with a wide variety of industry leaders, their organisations and governments on the topic of Talent and Neurodiversity at Work.

Watch the full webinar here:

Webinar Summary

While neurodiversity is a natural variation in the makeup of our brains, society continues to lean into neurotypical thinking. This results in accidental trauma for children who face negative feedback and judgement on their processing differences. These children can grow into adults who expect further insults to their self-concepts resulting in large numbers of neurodivergent adults either hiding or masking their differences. 

Current research suggests 1 in 3 autistic people worry about being mistreated in the workplace. And around 1 in 4 don’t want to share their diagnosis at all. But these situations can exacerbate problems and increase mental health and performance problems. 

In this webinar episode, writer and presenter Theo Smith offers a review of conceptual theories and strategies that can help address such problems and encourage positive diversity.

🏷️ The pros and cons of labelling, and why no label should be required

Labelling people with neurodivergence has some pros and cons. On one hand, a diagnosis of ADHD, autism, dyslexia or epilepsy can feel validating and lead to a sense of acceptance. A diagnosis can also unlock access to much-needed support in education or work. And doing so can help individuals to realise their talents and abilities. 

At the same time there are downsides to a neurodivergent label. They can make individuals feel unusual and apart from everyone else. And highlighting differences can make others receive us with negativity. Stigmas and misunderstandings remain in society. And a ‘special label’ can make others feel like someone is seeking special treatment.  

A report by Neurodiversity in Business revealed 64% of individuals with neurodivergence worried about discrimination. And this reveals the paradox in labelling that is, ultimately, not helpful. 

Gaining a diagnosis also comes with difficulties and confusion, especially with co-occuring conditions. Many people face a battle to get diagnosed. But even those who do receive a diagnosis can experience heightened feelings of exclusion, stress, trauma, and feel resistant to disclose. 

To address this, employers should take responsibility for creating environments that support and foster diverse ways of thinking. Providing supportive interventions to all members of staff, whenever they need it, can reduce the stigma that many people with neurodivergence face. And by reducing the need for labelling, neurodivergent individuals will feel more comfortable bringing their talents to work in a natural way.

💪 How to identify and leverage strengths in a neurodiverse workforce

Neurodiversity exists in every workplace and in every home. And while evidence proves each person has a different way of thinking, we’ve built a society on the assumption we’re all the same. This has left neurodivergent minorities feeling marginalized and isolated.  

While there are many medical terms to label brain differences, some of them aren’t helpful. And when multiple conditions exist, it further complicates things. 

To describe a new way of thinking about neurodiversity, Theo Smith uses an analogy of the Mexican Tetra cavefish. Around 2 million years ago, this fish evolved to its environment by becoming blind and developing translucent skin. Dwelling in darkened caves, this type of fish evolved within its environment to optimise its survival. And while this may appear as traumatic to an outsider, the loss of sight was an evolutionary development to preserve energy. 

When it comes to the modern human brain, we now know that it evolved over 200,000 years. And while many aspects of the brain adapted to its environment, modern work practices are moving at a pace that our brains struggle to keep up with. 

Awareness of neurodiversity and rates of diagnosis are rising. So workforces must start to open their minds to the benefits of adapting to variations in neurological processing. By acknowledging how these aren’t problems to fix but strengths to adapt to, they can improve employer branding and attract more high-calibre staff. 

🔨 Strategies for breaking down barriers in the workplace

Modern workforces face a paradox – they can only make changes for neurodivergent staff when staff disclose their differences. But the problem is many of them don’t. Plus, neurodivergent individuals can put up barriers to protect their self-concept. When they do, they block access to the help and support they need to thrive. 

So how can employers be proactive in meeting the needs of a neurodiverse workforce? Leaders may face their own internal barriers to change from key influencers and decision-makers. Sometimes this can impact other stakeholders too, who may see changes as unnecessary or costly. 

To address this issue, Theo uses a metaphor of ‘kryptonite’. Think of Superman/Clark Kent becoming disabled when exposed to it. Workplace barriers are the same and can act as a form of invisible kryptonite for neurodivergent staff when they experience repeated insults. 

One way to tackle this problem is through a workplace environment audit. In the webinar, Theo explains how this can help to identify where invisible kryptonite lies in office environments. And it’s a five-point process known as a Neurodiversity Audit. 

  • Audit and assessment of current systems and processes
  • Interviews with a selection of key stakeholders/users of each segment of the process
  • Internal workforce neurodiversity survey
  • Review and assessment of all quantitative and qualitative data, analysis, and information
  • Feedback sessions to discuss findings

The audit ends with a project report which highlights areas to improve and steps you should take to effect improvements.

🤝 How to lean out as much as leaning in to offer effective support

Neurodivergent topics are increasing in popularity, in particular on TikTok. The ADHD hashtag now has over 22 billion views on the platform. And while interest grows for neurodivergence in general, modern workplaces aren’t keeping up with the trend.

Addressing this by leaning into neurodivergence can start with understanding where the gaps are within each context. And then, finding appropriate solutions to meet these requirements. One way to do this is through individualised data analytics that help to review memory, vision, auditory skills and senses in each person.  

Something Theo also highlights is to consider how individual differences in brain functioning can bring out special and unique gifts. For instance, the Science Educator and Presenter Maggie Aderin-Pocock DBE has dyslexia. And this difference in her brain chemistry may fall outside of the neurotypical range but has not held Dame Maggie back from significant achievements. 

So, leaning into a process of supporting neurodiversity requires a careful balance of recognising differences, and nurturing them, but avoiding singling out individuals. Or giving them a label that others feel they must make extra allowances for. With data showing over 30% of the global workforce with some form of neurodivergence, this webinar will inspire leaders at all levels to understand which strategies they can use to promote neurodiversity in their individual contexts.

Watch the Q&A session here:

Read the Transcript

00:00:21.600 –> 00:00:23.331
I’ve learned so much as
a line manager, which

00:00:23.355 –> 00:00:25.288
I’m going to take back
to the workplace myself.

00:00:25.800 –> 00:00:28.184
The information was amazing.

00:00:28.200 –> 00:00:30.131
So many people
resonated and there was

00:00:30.155 –> 00:00:32.400
actually a lot of
functional information.

Read More

00:00:36.899 –> 00:00:39.819
My favorite thing was the talks
from Colin. I think he got the

00:00:39.843 –> 00:00:43.100
information across really accessibly
but also in a way that I felt

00:00:43.100 –> 00:00:44.900
was sympathetic to people with ADHD.

00:00:45.416 –> 00:00:47.646
Loved hearing about the
different lived experiences

00:00:47.670 –> 00:00:49.899
from Tom and from Demet.
Both brought a completely

00:00:49.899 –> 00:00:52.299
different view point across
so really fascinating to hear

00:01:05.680 –> 00:01:10.495
I wholeheartedly recommend
it. 11 out of 10 or 100 out of 10.

00:01:10.520 –> 00:01:14.200
I think they give you really practical
takeaways and an opportunity to

00:01:14.200 –> 00:01:17.795
network with other people in
this field in a safe environment.

00:01:18.600 –> 00:01:22.170
This was really well thought
through. Brilliant speakers.

00:01:22.200 –> 00:01:24.520
People really need
to check this stuff out.

00:01:35.497 –> 00:01:41.708
Hello. Hello everybody. Wow,
everyone’s joining. So yeah, welcome.

00:01:41.720 –> 00:01:47.080
Great to have you all here
at Skills Sessions.

00:01:47.099 –> 00:01:51.670
So Skills Sessions online — just
going to let everybody join. Welcome.

00:01:51.694 –> 00:01:55.380
Say hello in the chat. So yeah,
welcome, everyone, to Skills Sessions.

00:01:55.405 –> 00:02:01.092
This is an event series that’s both online
and in person, hosted by CareScribe.

00:02:01.480 –> 00:02:06.320
It’s all designed to share knowledge
about areas of neurodiversity

00:02:06.360 –> 00:02:11.055
and disability and, ultimately, to
help build and foster an inclusive

00:02:11.080 –> 00:02:14.560
community for these sorts
of topics to be discussed.

00:02:14.585 –> 00:02:16.786
Each event is based
on a different topic

00:02:16.800 –> 00:02:19.880
and we’re excited to have
Theo Smith here today

00:02:19.905 –> 00:02:24.286
to kick off 2024. Very exciting.

00:02:24.311 –> 00:02:26.515
So yeah lovely to see
so many of you here.

00:02:26.539 –> 00:02:28.083
Please say hello in the chat.

00:02:28.120 –> 00:02:30.479
Let us know where
you are joining from.

00:02:30.503 –> 00:02:33.200
How cold is it where
you are? We’re in Bristol.

00:02:33.199 –> 00:02:37.687
It’s sunny, but pretty cold —
had to defrost the car again today.

00:02:37.711 –> 00:02:42.199
Most of you have already
twigged, but on the Zoom chat,

00:02:42.199 –> 00:02:44.880
make sure the
settings are set to “All”

00:02:44.905 –> 00:02:49.135
just so everyone can
see your messages.

00:02:49.160 –> 00:02:52.135
Otherwise, you’re just messaging
the hosts and the panelists

00:02:52.160 –> 00:02:54.871
And whilst we’d love to
hear from you, let’s share it

00:02:54.880 –> 00:02:55.974
amongst everyone if we can.

00:02:55.999 –> 00:02:57.786
And yeah. Please
keep posting.

00:02:57.810 –> 00:02:59.529
Post throughout the session.

00:02:59.554 –> 00:03:02.518
Keep the chat going. If
you’ve been to these sessions

00:03:02.542 –> 00:03:04.699
before, that’s always
one of the best bits is the

00:03:04.699 –> 00:03:08.887
chat and the community that we’re
sort of fostering here. So yeah.

00:03:08.911 –> 00:03:11.351
Brilliant. Ah, I can
see a couple of other

00:03:11.375 –> 00:03:13.815
folks from the southwest,
and even Bristol.

00:03:13.840 –> 00:03:19.548
So that’s fantastic. Sunny and
cold from all over, it looks like.

00:03:19.572 –> 00:03:22.335
Fantastic. Brilliant.

00:03:22.360 –> 00:03:26.175
So I mentioned this
is Skills Sessions

00:03:26.200 –> 00:03:29.655
and it’s hosted by CareScribe.
So I’m going to spend just five

00:03:29.680 –> 00:03:32.775
minutes just telling you a little
bit about who CareScribe is

00:03:32.800 –> 00:03:37.680
and what we do. And then we
will get on with the webinar and

00:03:37.712 –> 00:03:43.232
hand over to Theo who’s got
some fantastic wisdom to impart.

00:03:43.240 –> 00:03:47.090
So about CareScribe — who are
we? So my name’s Rich. I’m one of the

00:03:47.114 –> 00:03:51.599
founders and directors of CareScribe.
For those of you who haven’t

00:03:51.600 –> 00:03:55.536
heard of us, CareScribe is an
assistive technology company.

00:03:55.561 –> 00:03:58.332
And, as I mentioned,
we’re based in Bristol.

00:03:58.357 –> 00:04:02.695
Myself and my other two
founders, Chris and Tom,

00:04:02.720 –> 00:04:05.680
we’re all neurodivergent,
as are many of our team.

00:04:05.720 –> 00:04:09.920
And as a company, we spend every
day working to support disabled and

00:04:09.900 –> 00:04:13.388
neurodivergent individuals to
work and study more independently.

00:04:13.400 –> 00:04:17.013
And we do this by
building technology.

00:04:17.208 –> 00:04:21.575
We’ve got a couple of
software tools, which you may or

00:04:21.600 –> 00:04:25.120
may not have heard of. One
of them is called Caption.Ed,

00:04:25.144 –> 00:04:27.872
which is a captioning
and notetaking software

00:04:27.880 –> 00:04:32.208
that’s used to help people better
comprehend and retain some of the huge

00:04:32.240 –> 00:04:39.005
amounts of information that’s thrown
at us every day in our busy lives.

00:04:40.310 –> 00:04:43.938
Of course, that’s of tremendous
value to a wide range of people,

00:04:43.962 –> 00:04:47.475
those with disabilities, those
with neurodivergent profiles.

00:04:47.500 –> 00:04:49.919
You know, from those who are
maybe deaf or have hearing loss

00:04:49.960 –> 00:04:53.800
who maybe find it difficult to
comprehend what’s being said,

00:04:53.800 –> 00:04:57.438
to those like me who are dyslexic or
have ADHD or ASD, who may have

00:04:57.462 –> 00:04:59.807
similar difficulties
and difficulties

00:04:59.831 –> 00:05:02.175
with focus and
retention of information.

00:05:02.200 –> 00:05:05.411
Or even those who have, maybe,
a motor impairment and find it

00:05:05.440 –> 00:05:08.693
difficult to get their
thoughts down quickly.

00:05:08.718 –> 00:05:12.478
Captions there, as I say, to help
them to retain and comprehend

00:05:12.535 –> 00:05:16.695
some of the barrage of information
that comes at us every day.

00:05:16.720 –> 00:05:18.780
And then there’s
TalkType. So TalkType is

00:05:18.804 –> 00:05:20.864
our other software
which is a dictation

00:05:20.880 –> 00:05:23.299
software that helps
people convert their

00:05:23.323 –> 00:05:25.680
thoughts into text,
something that I

00:05:25.699 –> 00:05:29.150
and a wide range of people
find very challenging for a wide

00:05:29.174 –> 00:05:32.899
range of of reasons. I’m not
going to go into too much detail on

00:05:32.899 –> 00:05:36.495
our software. That’s not
the purpose of today. But if you do

00:05:36.520 –> 00:05:40.080
want to find out anything more
about CareScribe or our software

00:05:40.100 –> 00:05:42.688
and technology, then please get
in touch. You can pop something in

00:05:42.712 –> 00:05:46.015
the chat and we’ll pick it up. We got
some feedback at the end of the event

00:05:46.040 –> 00:05:50.433
and also through our
website at carescribe.io.

00:05:50.440 –> 00:05:55.360
We can set up a demo and get any
information over to you. Fantastic.

00:05:55.969 –> 00:05:58.602
So, finally, a little bit of
housekeeping. Keep the chat coming.

00:05:58.640 –> 00:06:01.400
Let us know where you’re tuning in
from. Lots and lots of people — wow — lots

00:06:01.399 –> 00:06:05.763
and lots of people joining.
Fantastic. What a good start to 2024.

00:06:05.788 –> 00:06:10.233
So yeah. A little bit of
housekeeping on Zoom: so, hopefully,

00:06:10.240 –> 00:06:13.958
you’re well-versed in Zoom
by now, but if anybody needs

00:06:14.000 –> 00:06:17.325
captions they are available through
Zoom. We’ve enabled them at our end,

00:06:17.360 –> 00:06:20.899
So please enable them at
your end if you require them.

00:06:20.923 –> 00:06:25.600
Questions and chat — very much
encouraged. If you do have questions

00:06:25.600 –> 00:06:29.357
about what we’re talking about,
there’s a Q&A function. Pop it in

00:06:29.400 –> 00:06:33.880
there if you can. And we will and
will take time at the end to answer

00:06:33.899 –> 00:06:37.450
those questions. You can also
upvote your question. So if you spot

00:06:37.474 –> 00:06:41.695
something in particular that someone’s
written and you want an answer to,

00:06:41.720 –> 00:06:44.970
do up vote it because if
we’re short of time, we’ll try and

00:06:45.000 –> 00:06:48.350
prioritise them over
based on demand.

00:06:48.360 –> 00:06:50.264
There’s no wrong
questions. This is a

00:06:50.280 –> 00:06:52.800
safe place to learn.
So, please, don’t hold

00:06:52.809 –> 00:06:57.215
on to your questions. Do ask
them. You’ll be glad to know

00:06:57.240 –> 00:07:01.017
this session is recorded. So
you’ll be getting a email from

00:07:01.040 –> 00:07:06.542
CareScribe after the event, and it’s
was also on LinkedIn tomorrow.

00:07:06.720 –> 00:07:12.198
So you will be able to access the
recording. So yeah. Keep your eyes

00:07:12.222 –> 00:07:17.699
peeled for that. The other thing,
finally, to mention is that we ran

00:07:17.699 –> 00:07:20.798
Skills Sessions throughout 2023
and they were really, really popular.

00:07:20.840 –> 00:07:25.120
We’re just kicking off 2024 now and
we’ve got lots planned for the year.

00:07:25.145 –> 00:07:29.061
So we’re running monthly webinars.
Obviously, this is January’s.

00:07:29.085 –> 00:07:31.030
We’ve got February’s
and March already

00:07:31.054 –> 00:07:33.000
out, so you can
sign up too. And lots of

00:07:33.000 –> 00:07:37.895
you already are signed up to
these. February’s topic is reframing

00:07:37.920 –> 00:07:42.400
neurodiversity for better mental
health. So if that sounds like it’s of

00:07:42.399 –> 00:07:45.918
interest to you, then please
sign up. We’ll be sure to send

00:07:45.960 –> 00:07:50.340
you details. March’s topic is
demystifying access to work,

00:07:50.373 –> 00:07:54.375
where, definitely, some demystifying
is needed. So yeah. Please tune

00:07:54.400 –> 00:08:00.735
into that if it is of interest.
Finally, end of the quarter,

00:08:00.760 –> 00:08:05.008
we are at the Dyslexia Show in
March. So if you’re going, we’re there.

00:08:05.032 –> 00:08:09.280
Come say “hi” — be nice to see you
in person. And if you’re not there,

00:08:09.300 –> 00:08:14.138
take a look at it because it looks
fantastic. Maybe you’ll want to join.

00:08:14.162 –> 00:08:19.000
Wonderful. So that’s
enough of me talking.

00:08:19.000 –> 00:08:23.974
I’m now going to hand over to Theo
— Theo Smith. So for those of you

00:08:23.998 –> 00:08:28.599
who don’t know Theo, Theo is
the founder of Neurodiversity World.

00:08:28.640 –> 00:08:33.748
He is a LinkedIn Top Voice. He’s
the author of the award-winning book,

00:08:33.760 –> 00:08:39.840
Neurodiversity At Work, and podcast
host of Neurodiversity With Theo Smith.

00:08:39.865 –> 00:08:44.535
So yeah — amazing speaker,
and we’re very, very lucky to

00:08:44.560 –> 00:08:48.845
have him here talking about
empowering neurodiversity.

00:08:48.870 –> 00:08:53.732
So without further ado, I’ll hand
over to to Theo. Keep the chat going.

00:08:53.760 –> 00:08:57.013
And yeah, I’ll
speak to at the end.

00:08:57.038 –> 00:09:00.093
Amazing. Thank you. Cheers.

00:09:00.120 –> 00:09:02.560
That’s incredible. I’m just
going to the awkward thing of

00:09:02.581 –> 00:09:05.329
sharing my screen
now. So great to be here

00:09:05.353 –> 00:09:08.100
with you all. I’m going
to try and inspire you,

00:09:08.100 –> 00:09:14.038
ignite some interest through some
storytelling. I’m 15 plus years in

00:09:14.062 –> 00:09:20.000
leadership roles in HR, recruitment,
working also within HR tech and

00:09:20.000 –> 00:09:23.810
a wide variety of organizations.
And I take some of that knowledge and

00:09:23.840 –> 00:09:26.016
expertise to support
organisations

00:09:26.040 –> 00:09:28.880
around neuroinclusion.
So let me —

00:09:28.899 –> 00:09:31.665
I can’t do two things at once,
clearly, because I was talking away and

00:09:31.680 –> 00:09:39.355
not sharing my screen. But here we
go. So that should have done it.

00:09:39.394 –> 00:09:45.684
So yes. I, in partnership with
Dynamis Group Talent Consultancy —

00:09:47.280 –> 00:09:49.514
yeah — there’s the
book and the podcast

00:09:49.538 –> 00:09:51.600
if you want to
find it later on and

00:09:51.600 –> 00:09:54.859
listen to some episodes or have
a little read. I co-authored the book

00:09:54.880 –> 00:09:58.280
with the incredible Professor
Amanda Kirby as well. And we’re now

00:09:58.299 –> 00:10:02.804
setting out to write our second
book. So keep eyes out for that.

00:10:02.829 –> 00:10:04.708
But it will probably
take 12 months to

00:10:04.733 –> 00:10:09.718
get out to you all. So
today’s topic. Here we go.

00:10:09.760 –> 00:10:12.864
Right, what is neurodiversity?
Probably, tonnes you here are like,

00:10:12.880 –> 00:10:14.898
“Right, I know what
neurodiversity is,” right?

00:10:14.922 –> 00:10:16.399
So I’m not going to teach you to

00:10:16.399 –> 00:10:20.535
suck eggs or whatever other term is
around teaching somebody something

00:10:20.560 –> 00:10:24.400
they already know, but neurodiversity,
for me, is the natural variation

00:10:25.100 –> 00:10:29.295
in our neurological makeup, right? Every
single one of us has a unique brain,

00:10:29.320 –> 00:10:33.366
billions of brain cells like a
thumbprint — not one of us has the same

00:10:33.440 –> 00:10:37.138
and just as be as
important to the ecosystem —

00:10:37.162 –> 00:10:40.595
so are diverse brains,
right? And we were

00:10:40.600 –> 00:10:43.339
meant to think differently.

00:10:43.363 –> 00:10:45.363
So that is what neurodiversity is.

00:10:45.400 –> 00:10:48.080
And it’s a powerful concept
for me because it takes

00:10:48.088 –> 00:10:51.700
a lot of the barriers down that,
unfortunately — and this is what we’re

00:10:51.700 –> 00:10:55.167
going to talk about —
sometimes labels can put up

00:10:55.200 –> 00:10:58.269
for individual scaling
and access to support.

00:10:58.294 –> 00:11:00.807
Right, but if we think
about neurodiversity

00:11:00.831 –> 00:11:02.614
as a concept, and
every single one of us

00:11:02.640 –> 00:11:05.329
having unique brain,
we’re talking about all

00:11:05.360 –> 00:11:08.280
of us — but, actually,
what we also need

00:11:08.299 –> 00:11:11.676
to consider is what those of us
who have been marginalised or

00:11:11.720 –> 00:11:15.367
system-impacted due to the
way that our brains work, right?

00:11:15.392 –> 00:11:19.935
And that’s the problem that we have,
that some individuals have faced

00:11:19.960 –> 00:11:21.452
barriers and, even
worse, they didn’t even

00:11:21.480 –> 00:11:23.600
know about it. So
historically, we all

00:11:23.600 –> 00:11:27.488
know that these neurodivergent
traits or neuro minorities or

00:11:27.512 –> 00:11:31.399
whatever the other terminology
you would like to use to describe

00:11:31.399 –> 00:11:33.311
people have been
locked out of the system

00:11:33.335 –> 00:11:35.247
because of the way
that their brain works —

00:11:35.271 –> 00:11:39.000
We’re talking about ADHD,
dyslexia, ASD, Tourette’s

00:11:39.200 –> 00:11:41.086
dyspraxia,
synesthesia, dyscalculia,

00:11:41.110 –> 00:11:43.375
Down syndrome,
epilepsy — I could go on.

00:11:43.400 –> 00:11:47.280
There’s also also other associated
challenges around chronic mental health

00:11:47.299 –> 00:11:51.037
illnesses, bipolar,
obsessive-compulsive, etc, etc, etc.

00:11:51.061 –> 00:11:52.701
For all of you
that know it, right,

00:11:52.720 –> 00:11:54.800
I won’t go on. But for
anybody who doesn’t,

00:11:54.799 –> 00:11:57.857
this is kind of the medical
terminology, I would say. We’ve got a

00:11:57.880 –> 00:12:02.200
problem with disorder too
much use of disorder. A lot of us

00:12:02.200 –> 00:12:06.283
are starting to see it through the
social model, not so much through

00:12:06.307 –> 00:12:10.700
the disability lens. Although that’s
not to take value away from that

00:12:10.700 –> 00:12:14.773
point of conversation, because much of
us need it to access help and support.

00:12:14.840 –> 00:12:17.600
It’s more to say that we are,
as a community, starting to

00:12:17.600 –> 00:12:19.743
reframe the way that
we see ourselves and

00:12:19.767 –> 00:12:21.909
the way that we would
like to see others.

00:12:21.934 –> 00:12:27.695
So yes. So let me
take a different journey.

00:12:27.720 –> 00:12:32.392
And if you’ve ever seen me speak
before I would — oh, yeah, so somebody is

00:12:32.400 –> 00:12:36.495
saying they prefer
using the term autistic

00:12:36.520 –> 00:12:38.600
referred to Autism
Spectrum Disorder.

00:12:38.625 –> 00:12:42.178
Just jump back — that is exactly
my point there. These are the

00:12:42.200 –> 00:12:46.560
medical terms that we didn’t get
to choose and that’s why we have a

00:12:46.600 –> 00:12:53.135
very stern-looking expert there
because these terms that were medical

00:12:53.160 –> 00:12:58.221
terms are not necessarily ones that
a lot of us have identified with.

00:12:58.246 –> 00:13:00.640
But we’re going to come on
two more about that in a second.

00:13:00.664 –> 00:13:02.375
This is the way that I
want to see it, though.

00:13:02.400 –> 00:13:04.095
This is the way I
like to see the world.

00:13:04.120 –> 00:13:08.148
The Earth itself is 4.5 billion
years in development, right?

00:13:08.172 –> 00:13:12.200
That’s important, right? 4.5
billion years this planet has

00:13:12.200 –> 00:13:15.888
been developing. We know that
the universe is expanding at a faster

00:13:15.920 –> 00:13:20.800
rate than we ever could have imagined.
So when we put our lives today

00:13:20.799 –> 00:13:25.938
into context of that period of
time, oh, it’s a pin-prick right?

00:13:26.240 –> 00:13:31.120
It’s almost inconsequential in
terms of the length of time that this

00:13:31.100 –> 00:13:36.788
planet that we live on, that we’re
borrowing time off, right, has been

00:13:36.812 –> 00:13:42.500
developing for 4.5 billion years.
Now, consider this, the Mexican tetra

00:13:42.500 –> 00:13:48.086
blind fish — one of the most researched
fish and animals on the planet —

00:13:48.120 –> 00:13:55.124
two million years ago evolved
or developed to be blind it.

00:13:55.149 –> 00:14:00.655
It lost its eyesight initially and,
eventually, it lost its eyes completely.

00:14:00.680 –> 00:14:03.880
And the reason being it took up a lot
of energy when you’re in the darkened

00:14:03.899 –> 00:14:09.495
caves of Mexico. And therefore,
you didn’t need this energy in these

00:14:09.520 –> 00:14:13.287
darkened caves to be wasted on
something that you couldn’t use.

00:14:13.312 –> 00:14:17.633
So they evolved to be blind. They
also evolved translucent skin,

00:14:17.640 –> 00:14:22.600
all of this to optimize to the
environment for survival, right —

00:14:22.600 –> 00:14:25.411
which is incredible two million
years ago. But actually, what we find

00:14:25.436 –> 00:14:30.575
is the Mexican tetra blind cave
fish that are now researched actually

00:14:30.600 –> 00:14:34.738
evolved to be blind only around
20,000 years ago. So not only are we

00:14:34.762 –> 00:14:38.899
seeing incredible adaptation to
an environment through what we

00:14:38.899 –> 00:14:43.420
would consider potentially traumatic,
from our own perspective, to lose

00:14:43.444 –> 00:14:47.899
eyesight and eyes, but actually
it’s happened. It’s cyclical.

00:14:47.899 –> 00:14:51.825
It’s been happening again and again.
The fish is predispositioned to

00:14:51.850 –> 00:14:54.100
make these
adaptations and changes.

00:14:54.125 –> 00:14:58.100
And that is incredible —
that a blind fish can

00:14:58.100 –> 00:15:01.953
be more competitive in that
environment than a fish with eyes

00:15:01.960 –> 00:15:07.520
because of the nature of the environment.
And how little do we give that in

00:15:07.500 –> 00:15:09.896
consideration to the
human brain and the

00:15:09.920 –> 00:15:12.760
way that the human
brain has evolved?

00:15:12.800 –> 00:15:16.880
So now, consider this, if
we consider neurodiversity by

00:15:16.899 –> 00:15:20.776
design, right, the neurological
variations by design,

00:15:20.801 –> 00:15:26.495
what we’re talking about is the human
brain has developed over 200,000 years —

00:15:26.520 –> 00:15:29.284
the modern human brain,
the big one in our heads, right?

00:15:29.308 –> 00:15:32.880
Before then, it was smaller. It’s
actually getting smaller again now.

00:15:33.500 –> 00:15:38.064
Technology — who knows where we’re going?
But 200,000 years ago it became big.

00:15:38.089 –> 00:15:40.228
And the reality is,
over that period of

00:15:40.240 –> 00:15:43.560
time, it’s optimised
to the environment.

00:15:43.680 –> 00:15:46.465
But we have a problem. If we
think around what happened to the

00:15:46.480 –> 00:15:50.024
Mexican tetra blind cave fish,
and we think about 4.5 billion

00:15:50.040 –> 00:15:53.787
years of development of the planet,
we think about 200,000 years of

00:15:53.800 –> 00:15:58.400
development of human brain — now,
what have we done, I guess, since the

00:15:58.399 –> 00:16:02.215
industrial revolution, right?
What have we done since we

00:16:02.240 –> 00:16:06.480
completely transformed the world,
possibly in less than 200,000 years?

00:16:06.760 –> 00:16:13.095
When we put people down mines, when
we put people in mills to produce

00:16:13.120 –> 00:16:17.400
cotton, when we did these things,
we were not thinking about the

00:16:17.399 –> 00:16:20.738
impact on the health and well-being
of those individuals. We were not

00:16:20.762 –> 00:16:24.100
thinking that they would die of of
horrible illnesses and they would

00:16:24.100 –> 00:16:29.426
suffer greatly. We were thinking
about building stuff, right?

00:16:29.595 –> 00:16:35.600
And the world that we’ve now built,
we built at such a rate of speed that

00:16:35.600 –> 00:16:41.984
we cannot expect the human
brain to evolve quick enough.

00:16:42.120 –> 00:16:44.591
It’s not possible when
we consider bright lights,

00:16:44.600 –> 00:16:46.895
noisy environments, planes,

00:16:46.920 –> 00:16:51.295
all these infrastructure that we’ve
built — AI machine learning and

00:16:51.320 –> 00:16:54.730
being put in chicken coops, then
being told to work from home.

00:16:54.760 –> 00:16:59.376
All of these adaptations and changes
are at such a rapid rate, and we’ve

00:16:59.400 –> 00:17:05.200
not thought about the impact on the
human brain, like we didn’t through

00:17:05.680 –> 00:17:11.280
the Industrial Revolution, and now,
globalisation — the internet of things, right?

00:17:11.307 –> 00:17:14.299
So we need to think about
adapting the environment

00:17:14.299 –> 00:17:19.091
because there is no way we can
expect the brain to adapt at pace.

00:17:19.120 –> 00:17:25.200
And by the way, the brain has been
evolving for 200,000 years, to be able

00:17:25.200 –> 00:17:28.514
to adapt to the planet
of 4.5 billion years.

00:17:28.520 –> 00:17:30.448
You can now see the
complexity, right?

00:17:30.472 –> 00:17:32.400
This is why we have to
take responsibility and

00:17:32.400 –> 00:17:37.788
accountability and open our
eyes and mind to the reality that the

00:17:37.812 –> 00:17:41.295
world we’re building
at a rapid rate is

00:17:41.320 –> 00:17:44.320
having a negative impact
on the human brain.

00:17:44.359 –> 00:17:49.175
So the reality is,
this topic is exploding.

00:17:49.200 –> 00:17:51.255
You go on Google
Trends, you can see

00:17:51.280 –> 00:17:53.215
people across the globe
are typing in neurodiversity,

00:17:53.240 –> 00:17:55.532
autism, neurodiversity
movement, at a

00:17:55.557 –> 00:17:58.575
rapid rate. People
want to know, right?

00:17:58.600 –> 00:18:04.175
TikTok, 12 months ago, 22.1
billion views of the #ADHD.

00:18:04.200 –> 00:18:08.335
Twelve months before that, I took the
same data. It was half that figure.

00:18:08.480 –> 00:18:11.735
I imagine, you know,
beginning of this year,

00:18:11.760 –> 00:18:15.575
it could be 40 billion, right? The
reality is more and more people

00:18:15.600 –> 00:18:19.793
want to know. It’s young people; it’s
old people; it’s people across the board

00:18:19.840 –> 00:18:22.948
are now going, “Wait a minute.
I’m facing barriers because of the

00:18:22.972 –> 00:18:25.929
way my brain works and I want to
remove those barriers, right? And

00:18:25.960 –> 00:18:32.095
And I want to influence organisations.
I want to influence environments,

00:18:32.120 –> 00:18:35.080
teaching environments. I want to
support my children to be able to

00:18:35.099 –> 00:18:36.997
remove some of these
barriers. And that’s

00:18:37.021 –> 00:18:38.823
why they’re going
any way they can go

00:18:38.840 –> 00:18:42.880
to be able to find information
to help empower them to be able

00:18:42.900 –> 00:18:47.788
to make these changes within their
environments, working environments,

00:18:47.812 –> 00:18:52.330
and for their family members.
But we have this challenge.

00:18:52.700 –> 00:18:58.255
The challenge is that we have these
labels and the labels, unfortunately,

00:18:58.280 –> 00:19:04.080
are not easy to access. And in some
areas of the world, they may not even

00:19:04.099 –> 00:19:08.935
exist as labels or they may have
negative connotations. And therefore,

00:19:08.960 –> 00:19:12.789
you may not want to be able to
connect with those labels at all.

00:19:12.814 –> 00:19:17.715
And we segment those labels in such
a way that they can be very confusing

00:19:17.739 –> 00:19:22.299
and complex, whereas we don’t
just have motivation; we don’t just

00:19:22.299 –> 00:19:25.655
have energy; you don’t just have
logic. We don’t just have creativity.

00:19:25.680 –> 00:19:28.720
Some of us may have more
logic, more creativity, more

00:19:28.700 –> 00:19:32.511
motivation, more energy levels at
any one point than someone else.

00:19:32.520 –> 00:19:36.235
But we all have them at some
point, right? And they cross over.

00:19:36.240 –> 00:19:40.648
There’s co-occurrence across these.
Well, the reality is, we now know

00:19:40.672 –> 00:19:45.175
that there’s co-occurrence across
these labels that we have that are

00:19:45.200 –> 00:19:54.295
attached to neurodiversity.
So consider this, we have these labels

00:19:54.320 –> 00:20:00.000
and they empower individuals to
be able to gain access to help and

00:20:00.000 –> 00:20:04.638
support, specifically within the
school system, education system.

00:20:04.663 –> 00:20:07.799
So there are parents who are stressed
out and anxious and banging their

00:20:07.799 –> 00:20:12.409
heads against a wall — they need the
label because the label, at the moment,

00:20:12.440 –> 00:20:16.720
is the only way that we, as
parents, can gain help and support

00:20:16.700 –> 00:20:23.738
for our child within that environment.
So the ADHD label comes with

00:20:23.762 –> 00:20:30.799
support if we can get the label.
Autistic label, autism label comes

00:20:30.799 –> 00:20:36.615
with support. But when in reality like
me or my daughter, we are autistic,

00:20:36.640 –> 00:20:40.080
ADHD, dyslexic — and who
knows what else — we could collect

00:20:40.099 –> 00:20:45.295
these labels up — that becomes
problematic because when you’re going

00:20:45.320 –> 00:20:49.920
for one label, you may be able to
get it, but then, you may not get the

00:20:49.900 –> 00:20:53.588
other label. However, the
reality is there’s co-occurrence there.

00:20:53.612 –> 00:20:56.862
You’re impacted by both. You’re
just not able to demonstrate.

00:20:56.880 –> 00:21:00.052
And that may well be because of
your early years’ experience because

00:21:00.077 –> 00:21:07.340
the diagnostic assessment model is built
around those early years experiences.

00:21:07.400 –> 00:21:09.944
Well, what if you were able to
get the support in those early

00:21:09.960 –> 00:21:13.080
years that meant you coped,
you managed to get through the

00:21:13.099 –> 00:21:18.255
education system for whatever reason,
but actually, now you hit perimenopause.

00:21:18.280 –> 00:21:21.200
And actually, the
system that you exist in at

00:21:21.200 –> 00:21:24.979
that point, as a senior leader
for example, and the barriers that

00:21:25.004 –> 00:21:31.799
you start to face and the changes
in your makeup, become so challenging

00:21:32.099 –> 00:21:35.187
that you can no longer function
in the way you did before.

00:21:35.213 –> 00:21:37.255
But you don’t have the label,

00:21:37.280 –> 00:21:39.900
and you don’t necessarily
have the evidence from

00:21:40.200 –> 00:21:44.135
being a young person and being
a woman and the way that the

00:21:44.160 –> 00:21:47.732
diagnostic models worked,
the barrier is significant.

00:21:47.760 –> 00:21:51.352
Well, this is when labels start to
become a problem, not just in terms of

00:21:51.360 –> 00:21:53.628
accessing support
and help but actually,

00:21:53.652 –> 00:21:55.920
in terms of being
able to identify as

00:21:55.900 –> 00:21:59.643
having a label to fully understand
your neurological makeup,

00:21:59.667 –> 00:22:03.799
therefore, to be able to let somebody
know within the organisation,

00:22:03.900 –> 00:22:07.756
“Hey, I need help, and I need help
because of this.” It can become very

00:22:07.800 –> 00:22:12.880
confusing and therefore, the barrier
exists because you can’t get the

00:22:12.900 –> 00:22:20.335
help and support — and that you’ve
not had it at any point in your life.

00:22:20.360 –> 00:22:23.600
And the reality is is for a
lot of individuals, they may

00:22:23.599 –> 00:22:27.488
have not got the label but they
may be sitting with the trauma.

00:22:27.519 –> 00:22:30.015
So if you imagine,
for me, when I was

00:22:30.040 –> 00:22:32.455
in the classroom, and I
couldn’t say my name properly,

00:22:32.480 –> 00:22:36.495
I used to say “Theo” and
everybody else could say “Theo” —

00:22:36.520 –> 00:22:39.200
it becomes very traumatic when
everybody else can say your name and

00:22:39.200 –> 00:22:43.403
you can’t say your name. So whether
that’s the dyslexia or the autism

00:22:43.428 –> 00:22:49.455
or the ADHD, whether the speech problems
were associated with any one of those,

00:22:49.505 –> 00:22:53.362
in the big scheme of things, at that
point, it doesn’t really matter to me.

00:22:53.493 –> 00:22:57.034
What matters is everybody else
can say my name, and I can’t.

00:22:57.321 –> 00:23:00.999
Everybody else can spell and
write on the board, and I can’t.

00:23:01.023 –> 00:23:04.700
And that trauma that we experience as
a young person, whether you have

00:23:04.700 –> 00:23:09.288
a label or not, we carry through
into the workplace. And especially if

00:23:09.312 –> 00:23:13.900
nobody’s been able to communicate
to us what that means, what it looks

00:23:13.900 –> 00:23:18.392
like, why it’s happening, the impact
of it, where the support exists,

00:23:18.416 –> 00:23:22.700
even as an older person
with experience and expertise

00:23:22.700 –> 00:23:26.219
and somebody who’s been able to survive
up until this point, when I still

00:23:26.240 –> 00:23:31.000
walk into a board room, I still get
heightened level of stress and anxiety

00:23:31.299 –> 00:23:35.495
because I’m asked to go and write
on a board for this group of senior

00:23:35.520 –> 00:23:38.880
leaders, who I’m used to talking to.
But the minute I’m asked to write

00:23:38.900 –> 00:23:44.095
on a board, I still can’t spell;
I still can’t write properly; I still

00:23:44.120 –> 00:23:47.200
can’t construct grammar. Yes, I
wrote a book, but with the help of

00:23:47.200 –> 00:23:51.688
technology, and nobody was stood
there watching me whilst I did it.

00:23:51.712 –> 00:23:56.200
And fundamentally, this is really
what’s important: when we insist upon

00:23:56.200 –> 00:24:00.655
labels and when we insist that
people need to come with a diagnosis

00:24:00.680 –> 00:24:04.200
or that they need to come with
an expectation of what help and

00:24:04.200 –> 00:24:08.335
support they need, we already
a raising the bar far too high for

00:24:08.360 –> 00:24:12.200
many people. And when we also add
in the complexity of some of these

00:24:12.200 –> 00:24:15.788
labels, for somebody who’s
dyslexic who struggles with words and

00:24:15.812 –> 00:24:19.400
grammar and understanding words,
you’ve already locked me out of the

00:24:19.400 –> 00:24:23.255
conversation and the decision.
How many people do we do that to?

00:24:23.280 –> 00:24:27.961
And by the way, it doesn’t just
exist within entry-level roles.

00:24:28.000 –> 00:24:32.488
For example, this is happening to
senior leaders who maybe have coped

00:24:32.512 –> 00:24:37.775
for so long or this might be happening
to people within the legal system.

00:24:37.800 –> 00:24:41.871
This might be happening to
a judge, right? If we don’t have

00:24:41.880 –> 00:24:47.375
people who are ADHD within the
legal system, then we’re going to

00:24:47.400 –> 00:24:51.037
continue to have a disproportionate
amount of people with ADHD or who

00:24:51.080 –> 00:24:55.920
had ADHD going into prison — 1
in 3 in Wales, for example, from

00:24:55.900 –> 00:25:00.088
Professor Amanda Kirby’s research.
So these are the things that we

00:25:00.112 –> 00:25:03.745
need to consider all levels
throughout the organisation.

00:25:03.760 –> 00:25:08.118
We have barriers that we can remove,
and we’re not going to remove them

00:25:08.142 –> 00:25:11.375
by just having labels.
And the reality is, if we

00:25:11.400 –> 00:25:13.920
talk about labels, we need
to talk about disclosure.

00:25:14.040 –> 00:25:18.248
So even if we are privileged
enough, even if we fully

00:25:18.272 –> 00:25:22.058
understand our neurological
makeup — like, who really does? —

00:25:22.080 –> 00:25:27.328
the reality is will we then
want to share that information?

00:25:27.352 –> 00:25:29.258
And this is a problem
that you have within

00:25:29.280 –> 00:25:32.600
the organisation is
you want people to

00:25:32.599 –> 00:25:37.087
tell you about some of their
challenges, their strengths, their

00:25:37.111 –> 00:25:42.200
abilities, yet there’s fear and
anxiety because people have experienced

00:25:42.200 –> 00:25:46.166
trauma, stigma, barriers, even in
environments where they thought that they

00:25:46.190 –> 00:25:50.099
were safe and later found out that
they weren’t. And we can see this

00:25:50.099 –> 00:25:55.295
is independent research by Auticon
in 2021. And think about what’s

00:25:55.320 –> 00:25:58.720
happened since then — it’s not
got any better. But you can already

00:25:58.700 –> 00:26:02.802
see the — I mean 2 in 5 are
not ready to tell people.

00:26:02.827 –> 00:26:08.024
So irrelevant if you want them
to tell you, they’re not ready.

00:26:08.049 –> 00:26:14.015
And if we think about the impact from
a cultural perspective, there are

00:26:14.040 –> 00:26:17.520
some individuals who can’t have this
conversation at home. They can’t talk

00:26:17.500 –> 00:26:21.187
about this in their community. How
can you expect them to come into

00:26:21.212 –> 00:26:27.400
the workplace and talk about
being dyslexic or autistic or ADHD or

00:26:27.500 –> 00:26:31.438
combination of, when it’s not even
accepted to be able to have this

00:26:31.462 –> 00:26:34.521
conversation within their home
environment, within their culture?

00:26:34.560 –> 00:26:38.967
This is an immediate barrier to
individuals being able to gain access

00:26:38.992 –> 00:26:43.557
to support and help.

00:26:43.600 –> 00:26:46.880
So what can we do
about it? What tools

00:26:46.900 –> 00:26:51.031
are available? How can we consider
making some of these changes and

00:26:51.040 –> 00:26:54.658
adaptations if we can’t
get people to tell us, right?

00:26:54.680 –> 00:26:58.512
Because every single one of us has a
unique environment, a unique workplace.

00:26:58.537 –> 00:27:03.920
We have unique challenges. We have
unique pressures. By the way, we have

00:27:03.900 –> 00:27:07.448
unique individuals who put up significant
barriers to us making changes.

00:27:07.480 –> 00:27:11.475
That’s the reality. And we also
live in a world where we’ve got to

00:27:11.500 –> 00:27:15.143
have control of everything, even
as HR leaders or Business Leaders

00:27:15.160 –> 00:27:20.000
or even working within your area.
We have to collaborate with so many

00:27:20.000 –> 00:27:24.688
other people, and not everyone will
buy into the concept and therefore,

00:27:24.712 –> 00:27:28.253
that can become quite challenging
to get things over the line.

00:27:28.330 –> 00:27:32.993
And a great point there — and the
barrier of getting a diagnosis in the

00:27:33.000 –> 00:27:38.200
first place. So my child, it took
us five years on waiting lists and of

00:27:38.200 –> 00:27:42.126
filling out forms to get the
ADHD and autism diagnosis.

00:27:42.160 –> 00:27:44.471
And by the way, there
were two separate

00:27:44.495 –> 00:27:47.295
lists, waiting lists.
And when we did get it,

00:27:47.320 –> 00:27:50.560
we then had to go through the process
of the EHCP because we realised

00:27:50.584 –> 00:27:57.500
actually, in the education setting,
the autism and ADHD diagnosis is

00:27:57.500 –> 00:28:02.455
like stilts with a match ready to
burn the studs beneath them

00:28:02.480 –> 00:28:04.735
because you can gain
support, and unless

00:28:04.760 –> 00:28:06.000
those individuals
who are giving you

00:28:06.000 –> 00:28:07.935
support decide they don’t
want to give it anymore,

00:28:07.960 –> 00:28:10.520
and you have not a
leg to stand on legally.

00:28:10.560 –> 00:28:13.000
So therefore, in
the UK, we had to

00:28:13.000 –> 00:28:16.938
progress to get the EHCP, which is
almost impossible to get in certain

00:28:16.960 –> 00:28:20.880
areas now, and the funding is changed.
Therefore the government now wants

00:28:20.900 –> 00:28:24.895
to discourage giving out EHCPs
because they want to change the

00:28:24.920 –> 00:28:28.280
mechanism of the way individuals
get support and they want to push it

00:28:28.299 –> 00:28:33.575
back into the education system,
which is very problematic. So, yeah.

00:28:33.600 –> 00:28:38.000
I fully understand the complexity
around getting a diagnosis unless

00:28:38.000 –> 00:28:41.262
you’re willing to go private
and the costs are significant,

00:28:41.280 –> 00:28:47.280
and the trust has gone from some of
these organisations because of the

00:28:47.299 –> 00:28:50.960
negative press in some of these
areas which has not helped.

00:28:52.320 –> 00:28:56.815
So what we need to do to remove
some of these barriers is we need to

00:28:56.840 –> 00:29:01.080
consider where kryptonite exists
within our systems, our processes,

00:29:01.600 –> 00:29:05.381
our communications. And I describe it
as kryptonite because whether you

00:29:05.400 –> 00:29:09.192
talk about Superman or whether you
talk about Clark Kent, if kryptonite

00:29:09.217 –> 00:29:14.895
is introduced into either of
their worlds, they become

00:29:14.920 –> 00:29:18.819
completely disabled. They’re
not able to carry out any task —

00:29:18.843 –> 00:29:23.855
irrelevant of whether it’s a
significant power skill, whatever —

00:29:23.880 –> 00:29:26.891
they’re completely disabled
to be able to do anything.

00:29:26.920 –> 00:29:32.080
And the problem we have there is
that often the kryptonite within our

00:29:32.099 –> 00:29:37.888
working environment is not visible.
Right? And the greater challenge

00:29:37.912 –> 00:29:43.700
is that because as individuals,
especially if I consider individuals

00:29:43.700 –> 00:29:49.335
with later diagnosis or individuals
who self diagnosis based on

00:29:49.360 –> 00:29:53.080
information that they’ve had —
not to gain anything, because of an

00:29:53.099 –> 00:29:56.888
insight to be able to help themselves
— we have spoon-fed ourselves

00:29:56.912 –> 00:30:00.700
to kryptonite for so long we’ve
become used to it. That doesn’t mean

00:30:00.700 –> 00:30:05.338
we’re able to perform effectively
in it. It just means we’re so used

00:30:05.362 –> 00:30:10.495
to spoon-feeding ourselves this
kryptonite, that it’s become a way of life.

00:30:10.520 –> 00:30:14.615
And you can define it as masking,
but it’s not just about masking.

00:30:14.640 –> 00:30:17.680
It’s the idea that you do
something to again and again and

00:30:17.700 –> 00:30:22.538
again, that is debilitating; that
is harmful; that hurts you.

00:30:22.562 –> 00:30:26.776
It’s like eating peanuts when
you have an allergy, right?

00:30:26.800 –> 00:30:28.588
You have just enough
allergy that you can

00:30:28.612 –> 00:30:30.855
survive every time,
but you keep doing it

00:30:30.880 –> 00:30:32.870
because people tell you,
“Eat the peanuts. It’s fine.”

00:30:32.880 –> 00:30:36.584
Everybody eats them. We all have to eat
our share of peanuts every single day

00:30:36.600 –> 00:30:41.323
to ensure that we complete our
work. And it’s become so harmful that

00:30:41.360 –> 00:30:44.569
it’s significantly impacted our
mental health and wellbeing.

00:30:44.594 –> 00:30:50.200
And that is why the topic’s becoming big.
We need, as a community, but also with

00:30:50.200 –> 00:30:54.338
the support of those in key positions
— yes, those leaders within HR,

00:30:54.362 –> 00:30:58.768
within people functions, but also
leaders of people, operationally,

00:30:58.799 –> 00:31:02.979
we need you to also do something
about this, to understand what the

00:31:03.000 –> 00:31:07.628
kryptonite looks like, and to
support us in either bridging it,

00:31:07.640 –> 00:31:12.042
so that some of us can circumvent it
or, in actual fact, eliminating it,

00:31:12.067 –> 00:31:15.052
taking it away where it
does not need to be there.

00:31:15.077 –> 00:31:18.480
So one way that we’ve been

00:31:18.500 –> 00:31:22.027
able to do this, and a way that I
advise organisations to do it, is

00:31:22.040 –> 00:31:25.800
if you are thinking of a
consumer process, if you’re selling

00:31:25.799 –> 00:31:29.542
something, you go talk to your
sales and marketing team, especially

00:31:29.560 –> 00:31:34.200
if you’re thinking about it in a
consumer market. If you’re looking at

00:31:34.200 –> 00:31:39.255
the journey of a consumer, where
they drop out in that journey really

00:31:39.280 –> 00:31:42.880
matters, and if you get somebody
right up to the end of that consumer

00:31:42.900 –> 00:31:47.895
journey, and they’re almost about to buy
your product or walk into your store,

00:31:47.920 –> 00:31:51.800
but they don’t, that is a
that is somebody you want to

00:31:51.799 –> 00:31:55.095
hyperfocus on, right? Because you want
to understand why they’re dropping out.

00:31:55.120 –> 00:31:59.099
And you would run that right back
and you’d adapt and change every

00:31:59.099 –> 00:32:01.465
part of that process
to optimise it, to make

00:32:01.489 –> 00:32:03.855
sure that we carry that
person right through.

00:32:03.880 –> 00:32:07.062
We don’t do that as well with —

00:32:07.080 –> 00:32:09.207
We don’t really
do it at all with

00:32:09.231 –> 00:32:13.015
candidates with employees,
yet candidates and employees

00:32:13.040 –> 00:32:15.236
can also be consumers
as well. Therefore,

00:32:15.260 –> 00:32:17.400
they can be very
important in terms of

00:32:17.400 –> 00:32:22.364
the organisation that we work
in. So I asked organisations to

00:32:22.388 –> 00:32:28.099
consider this. And it’s not a simple
process. And that may initially

00:32:28.099 –> 00:32:32.815
make you think the hints and tips
Theo’s giving me means it’s a lot of work.

00:32:32.840 –> 00:32:34.945
But actually, I think that
work’s really important.

00:32:34.960 –> 00:32:40.495
And if you were to segment all of
your process, if we think about your

00:32:40.520 –> 00:32:44.400
employee life cycle and you were
to break it down and segment it and

00:32:44.400 –> 00:32:47.422
to think, OK, what parts of it
do we think we might be failing

00:32:47.440 –> 00:32:51.920
individuals most from a neuroinclusive
perspective? And if we started

00:32:51.900 –> 00:32:55.338
to look at those and audit those
systems and processes, then we’re

00:32:55.362 –> 00:32:58.448
going to be able to understand
the way those barriers are.

00:32:58.480 –> 00:33:02.407
And that may well be through including
your current workforce. It may

00:33:02.432 –> 00:33:07.200
be through using external suppliers
or technologies or systems to be

00:33:07.225 –> 00:33:12.575
able to understand or to plug those
gaps. But until we start to do that,

00:33:12.600 –> 00:33:16.800
we’re going to miss out
significantly. And my suggestion is to

00:33:16.900 –> 00:33:21.321
audit and assess those systems and
processes. And you can do them one

00:33:21.345 –> 00:33:24.095
by one or you can
do it is a complete

00:33:24.120 –> 00:33:26.960
overhaul of all the
systems and processes.

00:33:27.000 –> 00:33:31.375
However, before you start that,
you need to increase awareness

00:33:31.400 –> 00:33:34.255
within your organisation. You
need to help your workforce

00:33:34.280 –> 00:33:38.856
understand what neurodiversity
is, what neuroinclusion is, why it

00:33:38.880 –> 00:33:43.900
matters, and why you’re going to
start on this journey of looking at

00:33:43.900 –> 00:33:47.450
where the challenges are within
the organisation before you

00:33:47.475 –> 00:33:53.080
take the steps to rectify them.
Because, at some point, you’re going to

00:33:53.099 –> 00:34:00.335
want to interview, assess, and
communicate with that workforce

00:34:00.360 –> 00:34:04.000
to understand how it is impacting
them. And some of that will be

00:34:04.000 –> 00:34:06.670
anonymous through surveys, and
some of that will be directly through

00:34:06.680 –> 00:34:09.483
sitting down and having
one-to-one conversations.

00:34:09.508 –> 00:34:12.655
Now we’ve done this
with an organisation.

00:34:12.680 –> 00:34:15.440
We’ve worked with
them for quite some time.

00:34:15.480 –> 00:34:18.001
But specifically
around neurodiversity,

00:34:18.025 –> 00:34:20.480
around a year ago,
we worked through

00:34:20.500 –> 00:34:24.138
this process with them. First
of all, we talked to the board and

00:34:24.162 –> 00:34:28.415
senior leadership team and advised them
on neurodiversity and neuroinclusion.

00:34:28.440 –> 00:34:31.347
So we got them bought in at
the top of your organisation.

00:34:31.372 –> 00:34:37.455
Now, Clariane — one of the largest health
and wellbeing organisations in Europe.

00:34:37.480 –> 00:34:42.215
We worked directly with their
UK arm, Berkley, and through

00:34:42.240 –> 00:34:46.400
working with the senior leadership
team at Clariane level, then at

00:34:46.400 –> 00:34:49.962
UK level, then working with their
management team to help them

00:34:49.986 –> 00:34:53.900
understand what neurodiversity
is, what neuroinclusion is,

00:34:53.900 –> 00:34:57.888
what we mean by it, and how it
potentially impacts their workforce.

00:34:57.912 –> 00:35:01.900
Then, talking to the rest of the
workforce so that they understand

00:35:01.900 –> 00:35:07.620
some of the terminology. And
we then surveyed the workforce

00:35:07.644 –> 00:35:14.055
alongside doing the assessment of
these different systems and processes.

00:35:14.080 –> 00:35:17.139
So that, ultimately, at the end
of it, we could feed back to them,

00:35:17.160 –> 00:35:21.400
to let them know where
the barriers were and if they

00:35:21.400 –> 00:35:23.810
can remove them. And by the
way, you can do this yourself.

00:35:23.835 –> 00:35:26.211
You don’t necessarily need to
work with an external provider.

00:35:26.236 –> 00:35:29.701
You might have somebody who’s skilled in
auditing and assessment. You might want to

00:35:29.720 –> 00:35:34.402
work with different providers at
different areas of that process.

00:35:34.427 –> 00:35:37.929
But you need to understand where the
gaps are, because until you do, you’re

00:35:37.960 –> 00:35:40.233
not able to plug the gaps;
you’re not able to rectify them.

00:35:40.371 –> 00:35:45.855
And so much insight came out from
surveying the workforce anonymously.

00:35:45.880 –> 00:35:50.000
One of the questions we asked them
was do they identify — after all the

00:35:50.000 –> 00:35:56.175
sessions we did with them — do they
identify as being from a neurominority?

00:35:56.200 –> 00:35:58.904
Ie, we’ve gone through
sessions with them.

00:35:58.929 –> 00:36:01.735
But ie, “Do you
identify as being ADHD?

00:36:01.760 –> 00:36:04.640
Dyslexic? Dyscalculic? And
do you have a diagnosis?”

00:36:04.660 –> 00:36:09.255
One in ten of they work force
came back and said, “Yes, we do.”

00:36:09.280 –> 00:36:13.255
Now, what’s important
with that is we don’t know for

00:36:13.280 –> 00:36:16.680
100% they accurately do. We’re
not we’re not asking for them to

00:36:16.900 –> 00:36:21.055
verify it with a document. What
we’re now seeing is 1 in 10 people

00:36:21.080 –> 00:36:24.480
are saying within the organisation
that, “Yes, we identify with it and

00:36:24.500 –> 00:36:29.190
we’re facing barriers.” We then went
on to ask them if they don’t have

00:36:29.200 –> 00:36:34.080
a diagnosis, do they identify with
being from a neurominority and

00:36:34.099 –> 00:36:36.794
facing barriers because it’s
in your neurological makeup?

00:36:36.819 –> 00:36:39.465
We got up to 3 in 10.
Two in ten more said,

00:36:39.489 –> 00:36:42.135
“Yes.” That was 3 in
10 of their workforce.

00:36:42.160 –> 00:36:44.821
We then asked if they have a
family member who they’re

00:36:44.840 –> 00:36:48.184
responsible for who they believed to
be from a neurominority,

00:36:48.209 –> 00:36:51.455
and we got up to —
it was almost 50% of

00:36:51.480 –> 00:36:53.120
the workforce. Now,
you can understand

00:36:53.143 –> 00:36:57.800
the impact that that now has. That
insight and information, along with loads

00:36:57.800 –> 00:37:02.958
of other insights that we
extracted, would able then to allow

00:37:03.000 –> 00:37:08.815
the organisation to take action and
to start working groups and to start

00:37:08.840 –> 00:37:12.258
further training and development with
managers, with the understanding

00:37:12.282 –> 00:37:15.699
that this was important to the
organisation, and the employees were

00:37:15.699 –> 00:37:19.181
saying, “We are facing barriers,
and these are the types of

00:37:19.205 –> 00:37:23.300
barriers that we’re facing.” At no
point would individuals having to

00:37:23.300 –> 00:37:28.438
come forwards and say, “I am dyslexic
and help me for this reason.”

00:37:28.462 –> 00:37:33.599
This was around understanding where
the problems were, how it was impacting

00:37:33.599 –> 00:37:37.571
the workforce, and then thinking
about a longer-term strategy around

00:37:37.596 –> 00:37:41.907
how we were going to
be able to deal with them.

00:37:42.467 –> 00:37:47.695
And what you then
find is — my co-author,

00:37:47.720 –> 00:37:49.840
Professor Amanda
Kirby, has created

00:37:49.875 –> 00:37:54.475
some incredible technology and
consultancy and advisory around then being

00:37:54.500 –> 00:37:59.538
able to help individuals understand
their individual neurological

00:37:59.562 –> 00:38:04.376
makeup and how they can be
supported. So, on the one hand,

00:38:04.401 –> 00:38:08.569
you need to be understanding your
systems, your processes, the barriers,

00:38:08.600 –> 00:38:14.320
the potential negative impact
lifting the lid off Pandora’s box,

00:38:14.599 –> 00:38:19.087
but also, then, being able to support
individuals that if they’re not

00:38:19.111 –> 00:38:23.599
privileged enough to be able to
gain the access to support through a

00:38:23.599 –> 00:38:27.837
diagnosis or may not want to go through
that process because it’s too long,

00:38:27.861 –> 00:38:32.099
you’re helping them understand
their neurological makeup and where

00:38:32.099 –> 00:38:36.252
some of the challenges and opportunities
may come from. And the real

00:38:36.280 –> 00:38:41.520
issue here is that a lot of people
may be misinformed, misadvised,

00:38:41.500 –> 00:38:45.302
misunderstood their neurological
makeup and therefore, they may really

00:38:45.327 –> 00:38:51.000
be able — they may be struggling in
communicating to the organisation of

00:38:51.000 –> 00:38:55.255
what they’re having problems with,
of why they’re not able to finish

00:38:55.280 –> 00:38:58.775
certain tasks, of why they’re
struggling to communicate with certain

00:38:58.800 –> 00:39:04.888
people, of why they keep on
getting into hot water over certain

00:39:04.912 –> 00:39:11.000
pieces of work, conversations,
etc. So I utilised to Do-IT Profiler

00:39:11.000 –> 00:39:16.146
by Amanda Kirby, not just for
myself when I started to explore my

00:39:16.170 –> 00:39:21.800
neurological makeup about 6/7 years
ago, when I realised — dyslexia,

00:39:22.000 –> 00:39:24.716
that I was diagnosed
with as a mature student,

00:39:24.740 –> 00:39:27.455
with no formal
qualifications in university —

00:39:27.480 –> 00:39:29.764
I was diagnosed
there with dyslexia.

00:39:29.800 –> 00:39:33.615
It was many, many years later that
I was thinking there’s something

00:39:33.640 –> 00:39:34.905
else going on in
my brain. And there’s

00:39:34.929 –> 00:39:36.400
other barriers
and opportunities I’m

00:39:36.400 –> 00:39:40.135
just not understanding — I utilised
the Do-IT Profiler to help me to

00:39:40.160 –> 00:39:43.055
be able to better understand that
neurological makeup, and it was powerful.

00:39:43.080 –> 00:39:47.804
I then utilised it to advocate
for my child because the school

00:39:47.840 –> 00:39:53.000
were not that forthcoming
because she’s highly introverted

00:39:53.000 –> 00:39:57.220
and quite quiet and compliant
and therefore, wasn’t a problem.

00:39:57.240 –> 00:40:00.415
Yet, she wasn’t
obtaining the information

00:40:00.440 –> 00:40:02.640
and she wasn’t learning
in that environment.

00:40:02.680 –> 00:40:04.997
And, for me, if you’re not learning
in the environment, that’s the greater

00:40:05.022 –> 00:40:08.200
problem, not whether you’re
compliant or not. And therefore I

00:40:08.199 –> 00:40:11.988
was able to utilise it to help me
advocate for my child because the

00:40:12.012 –> 00:40:15.800
the child version enabled us to have
that. Now, by the way, I’m sharing

00:40:15.800 –> 00:40:18.433
some tools and concepts
and ways of working —

00:40:18.457 –> 00:40:20.775
You can do these
things yourself.

00:40:20.800 –> 00:40:24.320
You can start very small.
You can support employees

00:40:24.300 –> 00:40:27.358
through simple mechanisms to better
understand some of the barriers

00:40:27.382 –> 00:40:30.300
and challenges. But there
needs to be trust that’s built there,

00:40:30.600 –> 00:40:35.472
initially, based on what we were
talking about around individuals are

00:40:35.480 –> 00:40:41.243
not comfortable at necessarily coming
forward with specific labels.

00:40:41.347 –> 00:40:48.375
So as I bring this to a close,
I’m hoping to ignite — I can see

00:40:48.400 –> 00:40:51.200
the conversations lighting up.
People are talking about diagnosis,

00:40:51.199 –> 00:40:56.300
the barriers, the challenges with
getting support. And it is horrendous

00:40:56.325 –> 00:41:03.074
out there, from the support
from the government, from local

00:41:03.099 –> 00:41:07.238
authorities. The money is not
there. We’re at a Tipping Point.

00:41:07.262 –> 00:41:10.615
I really, truly, believe that,
specifically within the UK.

00:41:10.640 –> 00:41:15.335
And something needs to change
significantly, but I do believe we have

00:41:15.360 –> 00:41:18.880
the power in this room today to
make a positive impact within the

00:41:18.900 –> 00:41:21.732
workplace, which is what we’re
talking about here, what I’m trying to

00:41:21.757 –> 00:41:25.662
excite and delight people
around the topic here.

00:41:25.687 –> 00:41:28.311
So there’s something
I want to leave

00:41:28.335 –> 00:41:31.335
you with before we
jump into questions,

00:41:31.360 –> 00:41:34.455
that you may have
and that’s we see

00:41:34.480 –> 00:41:35.708
the world in a different way.

00:41:35.720 –> 00:41:37.713
Whatever label we want
to put on it, whatever

00:41:37.737 –> 00:41:40.095
understanding of co-occurrence
and everything else,

00:41:40.120 –> 00:41:42.775
we all have a way of
visualising the world, and

00:41:42.800 –> 00:41:49.495
whether that’s like High Contrast, who has
synesthesia, and he sees sound as colour,

00:41:49.520 –> 00:41:52.680
and that literally influences
all part of his music.

00:41:52.732 –> 00:41:58.815
One of the most renowned drum
and bass music producers — electronic

00:41:58.840 –> 00:42:01.920
music producers in the world,
as far as I’m concerned, and it’s

00:42:01.900 –> 00:42:07.562
because of the way that he
perceives the world through seeing

00:42:07.586 –> 00:42:14.099
sound as colour that makes him
incredible in what he does. Glen Keane,

00:42:14.800 –> 00:42:16.853
who has aphantasia
or is impacted by

00:42:16.877 –> 00:42:19.520
aphantasia, however
you want to define it —

00:42:19.560 –> 00:42:22.400
he cannot visualise the
world through his mind’s eye.

00:42:22.400 –> 00:42:26.115
He doesn’t see things when he goes
to sleep in the same way that some

00:42:26.139 –> 00:42:30.775
other people might. Yet he’s one of the
most incredible cartoonists for Disney.

00:42:30.800 –> 00:42:36.055
And Maggie Aderin-Pocock,
who’s dyslexic, and when we think of

00:42:36.080 –> 00:42:39.800
the incredible way that she
perceives and sees the world,

00:42:39.800 –> 00:42:45.615
it is more common the individuals
who are dyslexic see in 3D, have

00:42:45.640 –> 00:42:49.600
incredible spatial awareness.
So if we taking the dyslexia, the

00:42:49.600 –> 00:42:53.687
aphantasia, the synesthesia, the fact
that a lot of us will just see in 2D —

00:42:53.960 –> 00:42:57.800
We are visualising the world,
we are experiencing the world in

00:42:57.800 –> 00:43:03.055
such a different way. And I see what
synesthesia — synesthesia for High Contrast —

00:43:03.080 –> 00:43:05.800
— it’s different for different
people — but it’s almost like

00:43:05.800 –> 00:43:11.015
one experience — the experience
of hearing sound — is impacted by

00:43:11.040 –> 00:43:17.295
another experience that others wouldn’t. So
in the instance for High Contrast, it’s colour.

00:43:17.320 –> 00:43:21.495
So when he hears certain
sounds, he has a significant colour

00:43:21.520 –> 00:43:25.455
come to his mind’s eye, and it’s
most prominent when he knows

00:43:25.480 –> 00:43:29.727
he’s creating the right types
of sounds. He also gets an

00:43:29.751 –> 00:43:34.880
experience of machines, so the
feeling of industrial machines and the

00:43:34.900 –> 00:43:39.171
beats are like machines and
therefore, that experience of beat has

00:43:39.195 –> 00:43:43.800
a significant impact on the way that
he creates and feels about music.

00:43:43.950 –> 00:43:47.647
This can also be seen not just
in music, but in artists and in other

00:43:47.671 –> 00:43:51.199
areas of the world in creative
elements of the way that people

00:43:51.199 –> 00:43:55.795
experience one thing, but they have
another, powerful experience that

00:43:55.800 –> 00:44:01.207
can come and interplay at the same
time. But this is the point, right?

00:44:01.240 –> 00:44:06.295
It is this incredible, diverse
way of a seeing the world and the

00:44:06.320 –> 00:44:09.520
Mexican tetra blind cave fish will
experience it in another completely

00:44:09.500 –> 00:44:13.338
different way. And by nature of
the way that we have evolved and

00:44:13.362 –> 00:44:17.815
adapted to exist in this incredible
planet. But I come back to the point.

00:44:17.840 –> 00:44:21.432
We have created the barriers.
We have created the challenges.

00:44:21.457 –> 00:44:26.400
We have created the bright
light. We are still creating barriers

00:44:26.400 –> 00:44:30.895
within our organisation. We
created systems like Horizon that

00:44:30.920 –> 00:44:35.280
meant that people went to prison
and, unfortunately, faced significant

00:44:35.300 –> 00:44:40.338
injustice in their lives. These are
things we humans created and instilled

00:44:40.362 –> 00:44:44.544
upon other people and told
them it was for their own good.

00:44:44.569 –> 00:44:50.255
We have the power to remove them
to change them to adapt them, right?

00:44:50.280 –> 00:44:53.948
But we need to take responsibility
for that and we need to go back into

00:44:53.960 –> 00:44:58.330
our environment and really take
some time, and to consideration to

00:44:58.355 –> 00:45:04.599
assess where those barriers are,
where those gaps are, and to work with

00:45:04.599 –> 00:45:08.136
others to be able to plug those
gaps and empower more people to

00:45:08.161 –> 00:45:13.975
thrive at work to succeed rather than
to struggle, which so many of us have.

00:45:14.000 –> 00:45:19.720
So thank you very much. I’m going to
stop sharing my screen and we can

00:45:19.762 –> 00:45:25.228
perhaps go into some questions.
Thanks for staying with me.

00:45:25.240 –> 00:45:30.255
Amazing. Thank you so much, Theo.
I don’t know if you would have been

00:45:30.280 –> 00:45:34.600
able to see but there was
great conversations going on in

00:45:34.599 –> 00:45:40.137
the chat whilst you were talking —
and just encouraging people to pop

00:45:40.161 –> 00:45:45.699
any questions you might have for
Theo and or myself in the Q&A section.

00:45:45.960 –> 00:45:50.946
We’ve got quite a few coming
through. And also, remember you can

00:45:50.970 –> 00:45:55.800
upvote as well. So, please
please, please upvote any that

00:45:55.800 –> 00:45:57.505
you particularly
want answers to.

00:45:57.529 –> 00:45:59.187
So I’ll read out a
couple of questions if

00:45:59.212 –> 00:46:02.130
that’s OK, Theo? And
then, if you’re happy to

00:46:02.160 –> 00:46:06.231
answer them. So Lucy’s asked,
“I’ve a question, please, about

00:46:06.255 –> 00:46:10.199
employees paying for neurodiversity
diagnostic assessments as

00:46:10.199 –> 00:46:14.637
many employees are asking for this.
In my view, this is not very —

00:46:14.661 –> 00:46:19.099
not a very social model approach,
not required for access to work, and

00:46:19.099 –> 00:46:24.653
also problematic for GPs, as they do not
accept privately assessed diagnoses —

00:46:24.920 –> 00:46:28.026
do not always accept
privately assessed diagnoses.

00:46:28.040 –> 00:46:31.357
It will be great to hear your view
on this.” So yeah. Do you have a

00:46:31.381 –> 00:46:35.000
view on — I guess there was
a lot of chatter around difficulties

00:46:35.000 –> 00:46:39.211
getting diagnostic —
diagnoses through the NHS.

00:46:39.240 –> 00:46:44.005
Obviously, there’s the private, but
that comes at a cost and then there’s a —

00:46:44.099 –> 00:46:47.862
sometimes a need in the
workplace for a diagnosis.

00:46:47.886 –> 00:46:52.199
Yeah, absolutely. So some organisations
will support it. I’ve worked with many

00:46:52.199 –> 00:46:56.850
organisations. Some see the
value in the needs. They may work

00:46:56.874 –> 00:47:02.000
with mental health and wellbeing
charities or or not-for-profit

00:47:02.000 –> 00:47:08.375
organisations. They may provide
support from a psychological

00:47:08.400 –> 00:47:12.480
perspective and therefore, at a
tipping point — that this is the key

00:47:12.500 –> 00:47:17.185
thing, right? A Tipping Point of
where they feel, “Hmm. Maybe this may

00:47:17.210 –> 00:47:23.199
become a legal risk,” they then
may pay for private diagnosis.

00:47:23.500 –> 00:47:28.295
The problem I have here is
that we don’t account — we still

00:47:28.320 –> 00:47:32.240
don’t account, in many instances,
for the level of co-occurrence,

00:47:32.280 –> 00:47:36.085
and we’re still focused on a
model the requires you to look into

00:47:36.110 –> 00:47:42.175
your past as a child, to be able to
identify whether or not you are autistic.

00:47:42.200 –> 00:47:45.700
You know, what were you like when you
were a child? What were you like —

00:47:45.725 –> 00:47:50.505
that leaves so much
confusion, potentially, and also

00:47:50.520 –> 00:47:55.588
a lot of us may not be able to
communicate that effectively,

00:47:55.612 –> 00:48:00.680
and therefore, we may miss out on the
support because we’re not able to

00:48:00.699 –> 00:48:04.687
access the label. So this brings
complexity for organisations

00:48:04.711 –> 00:48:09.300
because do they start just paying
£1000, £2000, £3000 per dual

00:48:09.300 –> 00:48:13.238
assessment, triple assessment or
whatever? And then because of the

00:48:13.262 –> 00:48:17.655
co-occurrence, you may not actually
come out as any but, in fact, you are,

00:48:17.680 –> 00:48:20.961
it’s just the model for
assessment is built poorly because

00:48:20.986 –> 00:48:27.400
you’re a woman and you’re black
and you speak English as a

00:48:27.400 –> 00:48:31.338
second language and and and and
and — and therefore, that diagnostic

00:48:31.362 –> 00:48:35.300
model did not suit your needs. We’re
then creating an additional layer

00:48:35.300 –> 00:48:39.570
of bias and barrier to certain people.
So if you’re white, you’re male

00:48:39.594 –> 00:48:43.377
your organisation pays for the
assessment, you get it, you pass —

00:48:43.402 –> 00:48:47.539
if you’re someone else, you may not.
See, I think it’s more complex than

00:48:47.563 –> 00:48:51.984
just “Should organisations pay for it
or shouldn’t?” We should have a better

00:48:52.099 –> 00:48:57.455
system where it’s intervention
from the government, right?

00:48:57.480 –> 00:49:02.735
We pay taxes. This shouldn’t be all in
on organisations from my perspective.

00:49:02.760 –> 00:49:05.560
It should be government intervention.
It should be support directly

00:49:05.591 –> 00:49:09.895
from the government. It should be
coming into to reduce waiting times.

00:49:09.920 –> 00:49:14.126
Also if we think about a
five-year period to get a diagnosis,

00:49:14.151 –> 00:49:17.494
where’s the help in the
five years? It’s not there.

00:49:17.519 –> 00:49:21.361
When we think about our child, it’s —
you’re on a waiting list, five years later

00:49:21.400 –> 00:49:25.436
you get that diagnosis. Oh then, by the
way, it doesn’t really mean anything.

00:49:25.461 –> 00:49:27.832
You still don’t have the knowledge
and expertise. You still have to

00:49:27.857 –> 00:49:31.000
go out and learn it all yourself.
You have to join communities and talk

00:49:31.000 –> 00:49:34.026
to other parents. That’s where
the power is. I’ve talked to other

00:49:34.051 –> 00:49:38.900
people in Slack communities or in
Discord communities about ADHD and

00:49:38.900 –> 00:49:42.982
be misinformed and be led by somebody
who’s not that genuine.

00:49:44.240 –> 00:49:50.480
You can see where companies are like,
“Whoa, don’t even want to go there or

00:49:50.500 –> 00:49:54.598
get involved.” What I think we
need is greater mechanisms for

00:49:54.622 –> 00:50:00.332
supporting individuals earlier
on. And that’s why I talk about

00:50:00.600 –> 00:50:05.775
not just identification of a
label because if you’ve not got

00:50:05.800 –> 00:50:08.313
it early on, it may be more
difficult to get it.

00:50:08.338 –> 00:50:12.558
But it’s the identification of where are
the barriers? Where’s the impact on mental

00:50:12.583 –> 00:50:18.300
health and wellbeing? Where’s the
potential points that will mean that

00:50:18.300 –> 00:50:23.300
you may end up without a job,
without a house, without support?

00:50:23.320 –> 00:50:29.520
And then you fall into a different area
of support, when we could have

00:50:29.500 –> 00:50:32.344
helped so much more people before
that. So I’m much more interested

00:50:32.360 –> 00:50:35.800
in the mechanisms we can put in place
that are much easier, simpler —

00:50:36.000 –> 00:50:39.888
just to allow individuals that,
yes, they would like a diagnosis of

00:50:39.912 –> 00:50:43.800
ADHD or autism, for example, because
they believe that they are and

00:50:43.800 –> 00:50:47.646
they deserve to have that diagnosis
in the wide support. But today,

00:50:47.670 –> 00:50:51.400
really, they just want to be able
to have better conversations with

00:50:51.400 –> 00:50:56.068
their manager, and are really
struggling. And it is linked with the

00:50:56.092 –> 00:51:01.199
way that they see the world, the way
they communicate, the way that the

00:51:01.199 –> 00:51:04.788
environment is impacting them and
making them feel. And I think that

00:51:04.812 –> 00:51:08.400
is something that we can change
tomorrow, but we can really start to

00:51:08.400 –> 00:51:13.375
think about that through the
auditing, looking at the systems and

00:51:13.400 –> 00:51:16.600
processes and making those adaptations
and changes. But we need to

00:51:16.599 –> 00:51:18.633
include the community in those
conversations, to make sure that we

00:51:18.658 –> 00:51:22.199
make the relevant ones within our
organisations and environments and

00:51:22.199 –> 00:51:25.739
communities and education settings
and what have you. Sorry, long answer,

00:51:25.760 –> 00:51:28.800
but this, it’s complex. That’s
the challenge that we’re facing.

00:51:28.984 –> 00:51:30.507
We need to simplify it.

00:51:30.520 –> 00:51:33.855
That leads really
nicely on to the next

00:51:33.880 –> 00:51:38.600
question, and actually, I’ll kind of
link to two together. So…

00:51:38.599 –> 00:51:42.702
Do you have any practical tips for line
managers to help create environments

00:51:42.726 –> 00:51:46.500
in which people feel more comfortable
disclosing at work? And then if —

00:51:46.500 –> 00:51:49.864
what would be a nice one is, “Is
there any — further down — is there

00:51:49.889 –> 00:51:55.699
any examples of any companies
that you worked from that

00:51:55.699 –> 00:52:01.255
provide examples of creating that kind of
neuroinclusive work and it being the norm?

00:52:02.440 –> 00:52:05.200
So let me tell you, if
you’ve not watched Sex

00:52:05.199 –> 00:52:08.937
Education, go and watch that as a
programme. Fascinating, right? Because

00:52:08.961 –> 00:52:12.855
I’m thinking around the generational
shift as well. And the reason

00:52:12.880 –> 00:52:16.280
why I mention that is because
some of the topics that come out and

00:52:16.312 –> 00:52:20.375
identify with the one of the main
characters, who’s the mum, who has a child

00:52:20.400 –> 00:52:23.300
She’s talking, as a sex therapist,
and he’s going through some

00:52:23.325 –> 00:52:28.400
experiences. I kind of feel that
almost as a dad to an ND child, as an

00:52:28.400 –> 00:52:31.538
ND dad, but who’s speaking
about this topic, right? Yet, I’m

00:52:31.560 –> 00:52:35.600
“vulnerable” in some respects as well
because I’m a human being like all of us.

00:52:36.200 –> 00:52:43.175
So when I consider that
journey and I think about having a

00:52:43.200 –> 00:52:47.400
conversation with somebody, a
meaningful conversation, often if you

00:52:47.400 –> 00:52:50.938
put all the weight and responsibility
on the individual they’re going

00:52:50.962 –> 00:52:54.500
to stop talking to you. So Sex
Education has a great example of where

00:52:54.520 –> 00:52:58.800
the mum is almost like. “Oh, she
told me. I didn’t know what to do

00:52:58.816 –> 00:53:03.300
with it. And then she stopped talking
to me.” And the advice there is

00:53:03.300 –> 00:53:07.399
to well, go back and learn something
— can take something to the table

00:53:07.423 –> 00:53:09.867
and share to show
you’ve thought about it.

00:53:09.891 –> 00:53:12.695
There’s no difference
with the manager, right?

00:53:12.720 –> 00:53:16.399
Where I’ve seen this work
within organisations, I love talking

00:53:16.423 –> 00:53:20.575
to Leena and Sean at BBC many years
ago — included them in the book.

00:53:20.600 –> 00:53:24.855
They basically — Leena went
to Sean and went, “This is who I am.

00:53:24.880 –> 00:53:28.000
This is what I’m about.” So she did
more right she came forward and he

00:53:28.000 –> 00:53:30.362
then went, “Right. I’m going to go
away and learn. I’m going to go and

00:53:30.386 –> 00:53:33.099
educate myself. And now I’m going
to bring that back to the table and

00:53:33.099 –> 00:53:35.716
say, ‘What do you think about
that? How do you feel about that?'”

00:53:36.861 –> 00:53:40.599
Rather than going, “Oh, you tell you’re
me autistic. So let me tell you about

00:53:40.599 –> 00:53:44.375
all the things I might be able to do
for you” — because you don’t really

00:53:44.400 –> 00:53:46.320
understand them. You don’t understand
the complexity of their life,

00:53:46.300 –> 00:53:49.915
what’s going on, their journey —
all of that you just immediately go

00:53:49.939 –> 00:53:53.655
solution building, which is
problematic. What you need to do as a

00:53:53.680 –> 00:53:57.168
manager is you need to be able
to go away and educate yourself a bit

00:53:57.192 –> 00:54:00.680
and then go like you would with
any conversation, “Hey, I listened to

00:54:00.699 –> 00:54:04.012
this podcast. This person was
sharing this stuff about this.

00:54:04.040 –> 00:54:07.800
What do you think about that?” Bumph —
opened up the dialogue, opened up the

00:54:07.800 –> 00:54:10.988
conversation. No pressure on
that individual to say that they need

00:54:11.012 –> 00:54:14.199
to share about themselves. But
you open up a conversation about

00:54:14.199 –> 00:54:18.066
something, and that starts to enable
you to develop that conversation

00:54:18.080 –> 00:54:22.600
further. Start small and build. Don’t
go on with the most, you know,

00:54:23.699 –> 00:54:31.295
dramatic problematic idea or
concept first of all. Just start with,

00:54:31.320 –> 00:54:35.311
“I watched this programme. And this
is how they portrayed this thing.

00:54:35.320 –> 00:54:39.103
I found it a bit odd or strange or I
was interested or fascinated. What

00:54:39.127 –> 00:54:42.800
do you think about that?” And I
think that’s a much more productive

00:54:42.800 –> 00:54:45.988
way to start having productive
conversation within the team

00:54:46.012 –> 00:54:49.199
as well, by the way. Start
as you mean to go on. Start

00:54:49.300 –> 00:54:53.007
building those conversations within
the team, build them individually

00:54:53.032 –> 00:54:58.099
and start to create that sense
of psychological safety, but, but

00:54:58.099 –> 00:55:01.488
protecting individuals because if
that person shares with the team

00:55:01.512 –> 00:55:05.838
that they’re autistic today, and you go and
to take another job as the leader tomorrow,

00:55:06.000 –> 00:55:08.680
where does that leave
that individual? Well, it leaves them

00:55:08.712 –> 00:55:12.500
with a different leader tomorrow.
And it may not be as a leader who’s

00:55:12.500 –> 00:55:16.338
as empathetic, as caring as
compassionate, as understanding, as

00:55:16.362 –> 00:55:20.199
appreciative as you were. So
we also have a responsibility and

00:55:20.199 –> 00:55:24.524
accountability as leaders, that just
because we think we’re good and

00:55:24.560 –> 00:55:30.000
we’re OK, and we’re doing the
best by them, doesn’t mean the next

00:55:30.000 –> 00:55:33.738
person will. So we have we have to
future-proof it as well. We have to

00:55:33.762 –> 00:55:37.500
think about the the longer-term
impact on that individual who’s been

00:55:37.500 –> 00:55:41.563
at the company for 15 years, and
we’ve only been there for 2, as

00:55:41.600 –> 00:55:45.920
a leader. So I think it’s not as
simple as, “Individual tell me your

00:55:45.900 –> 00:55:49.055
problems,” it’s what am I going
to do as a leader to protect that

00:55:49.080 –> 00:55:56.400
individual and to ensure that
they’re not left in a desperate

00:55:56.400 –> 00:55:59.065
situation in the future, which,
unfortunately, I think many are.

00:55:59.090 –> 00:56:01.865
That’s the problem we have.

00:56:01.880 –> 00:56:04.680
Thank you very much,
Theo, for answering that

00:56:04.699 –> 00:56:09.215
question. Yeah I couldn’t
agree with more with that, I think.

00:56:09.240 –> 00:56:12.480
Yeah, I mean, we —
line managing people, running a

00:56:12.500 –> 00:56:17.735
business as well, and especially
in this sort of assistive technology

00:56:17.760 –> 00:56:21.400
space — I think one of the other
things I’ve kind of learned is kind

00:56:21.426 –> 00:56:29.255
of leading, I guess, by example.
And not related to this, but it is —

00:56:29.280 –> 00:56:33.280
is that there’s a book called Radical
Candor, which somebody in our

00:56:33.300 –> 00:56:39.895
business advocated for and I
read. And one of the things that that

00:56:39.920 –> 00:56:45.000
advocates for is that, as a
leader, it’s useful to

00:56:45.000 –> 00:56:49.215
understand yourself and then
voice that back to people that you

00:56:49.240 –> 00:56:52.400
manage. So, for instance, for me,
I’m dyslexic. I have ADHD; I struggle

00:56:52.400 –> 00:56:54.788
with lots of different things.
I have quite bad anxiety.

00:56:54.813 –> 00:56:57.800
It’s saying, “Look, I’m going to be good
at these things. I might really struggle

00:56:57.800 –> 00:57:00.624
with that when you bring this
up, and this is kind of why. And I’m

00:57:00.649 –> 00:57:04.400
not that good at that,” and if you
can — if you’re setting the example

00:57:04.400 –> 00:57:08.138
that you can say these things to
people you manage and you can

00:57:08.162 –> 00:57:11.900
lead by example that you’re open
and transparent about the things you

00:57:11.900 –> 00:57:15.438
struggle with and how you want
the business to support you, even

00:57:15.462 –> 00:57:19.000
though you might be the leader then,
that does, I find, or have found

00:57:19.000 –> 00:57:21.830
that that has opened up
conversations the other way as well.

00:57:21.840 –> 00:57:26.320
Just very briefly. That’s incredible, Rich.
And it’s right. And I interviewed a

00:57:26.300 –> 00:57:30.338
manager and an employee, and
it’s on the podcast if you want

00:57:30.362 –> 00:57:34.400
to hear it, but they worked in
forestry. She was having significant

00:57:34.400 –> 00:57:37.588
challenges. In the end, she
was identified as potentially being

00:57:37.612 –> 00:57:40.800
autistic, and she got a diagnosis
and support. It transformed her

00:57:40.800 –> 00:57:45.351
experience. But what he said,
which was fascinating, was that,

00:57:45.375 –> 00:57:50.599
“I started, then, explaining to her she
needs to take time out. She needs to

00:57:50.599 –> 00:57:54.387
lie down on the floor when she
needs to she can cry. She — whatever

00:57:54.400 –> 00:57:58.600
it is” — all things that she needed
to do that she said herself

00:57:58.800 –> 00:58:01.863
that helped her in certain
instances. But then he was

00:58:01.887 –> 00:58:05.199
saying, “I realised I was telling her
all these things, and I wouldn’t doing

00:58:05.199 –> 00:58:10.538
any of them myself.” And he
said it, “Just — being, having a

00:58:10.562 –> 00:58:15.900
greater empathy and consideration
for her on her journey made me

00:58:15.900 –> 00:58:20.455
a better human being because,
actually, I wasn’t I wasn’t doing many

00:58:20.480 –> 00:58:23.600
of these things I was telling her
to.” And he didn’t necessarily need to

00:58:23.625 –> 00:58:28.095
lie down, but he did need to
think about the way that he saw the

00:58:28.120 –> 00:58:30.880
world and that he managed his life
and managed to other people and

00:58:30.900 –> 00:58:36.188
that he allowed others to manage him
and how he saw his workplace and just by

00:58:36.212 –> 00:58:41.500
turning the table, it educated
him on better mental health and

00:58:41.500 –> 00:58:45.469
wellbeing for him and is wider workforce.
I thought that was so powerful.

00:58:45.494 –> 00:58:50.000
Absolutely. Fantastic. And there
is quite a lot of questions left,

00:58:50.000 –> 00:58:53.888
which I, unfortunately, don’t think
we’ll get time to answer now, but

00:58:53.912 –> 00:58:57.800
we will get back to them and we
will send you responses afterwards.

00:58:57.800 –> 00:59:01.288
So even if you’ve got questions
popping up now, then still put them

00:59:01.312 –> 00:59:04.800
in the Q&A, and we’ll get
back. But I think it’s time for us

00:59:04.800 –> 00:59:09.638
to wrap up. So I want to finish by
just saying a massive thank you to

00:59:09.662 –> 00:59:14.500
Theo for joining us and providing
us that enlightening talk.

00:59:14.500 –> 00:59:18.790
That was really useful. And thank
you to everyone for participating

00:59:18.800 –> 00:59:23.480
and making these webinars so
enjoyable and such a dynamic

00:59:23.500 –> 00:59:27.288
event. So thanks so much for
that. Everyone’s going to get a

00:59:27.312 –> 00:59:31.099
CPD certificate. So, as you
leave, there is a survey

00:59:31.099 –> 00:59:34.973
that will pop up, If you can provide
us feedback, that’s really, really

00:59:34.997 –> 00:59:38.699
helpful. It helps us guide future
talks and events and make sure

00:59:38.699 –> 00:59:42.137
we’re covering topics and
bringing in speakers that you want to

00:59:42.161 –> 00:59:45.599
hear from. So please fill that
out. And then, after that, you’ll be

00:59:45.599 –> 00:59:49.887
sent to your CPD certificate for
the this event. As I say, the

00:59:49.911 –> 00:59:54.199
session was recorded. So we
will send that over to you, along

00:59:54.199 –> 00:59:58.935
with the transcript in the next
day. Next month’s webinars,

00:59:58.960 –> 01:00:02.400
please come along. As I mentioned,
there is one in February on reframing

01:00:02.400 –> 01:00:05.631
neurodiversity for better mental
health and one in March on

01:00:05.655 –> 01:00:09.500
demystifying access to work. Do
feed in by that survey to let us know

01:00:09.500 –> 01:00:13.372
what else you want to hear about
as we plan the the whole year aheads —

01:00:13.396 –> 01:00:17.699
webinar series. And that’s
fantastic. And yeah and come along to

01:00:17.699 –> 01:00:20.608
the Dyslexia Show. We’d love to
love to see you there. So we’ll ping

01:00:20.640 –> 01:00:25.280
you a link to join that as well.
And that is it. So, thanks again.

01:00:25.300 –> 01:00:29.538
Thank you, everybody, for joining
us. Thank you to Theo. Thank you for

01:00:29.562 –> 01:00:33.800
being so brilliant and joining in in the
conversations, and yeah. Hopefully, we’ll

01:00:33.800 –> 01:00:35.199
see you again soon.

01:00:37.800 –> 01:00:38.500
Thanks, everyone.